England in turmoil.
Three young girls have been slaughtered by a madman naturalized from Rwanda, and others are fighting for their lives.
For some time now, Sharia law has taken hold in certain neighborhoods of major British cities, which does not favor peaceful coexistence. The English working class has erupted in anger and indignation.
This has led to an armed counter-mobilization, giving the impression of an ethno-religious civil war. Authorities have responded with a heavy hand towards whites and a soft touch towards people of color.
How will it end?
Let’s start by identifying how the problem developed over time.
Non-European immigration began with decolonization. Nature abhors a vacuum: when dynamics don’t go in one direction, they go in the other.
It’s not racism to state what Africans themselves have been saying for a long time—that the hasty departure of Europeans disrupted the societies and economies of newly created nations.
These were the years of the economic boom in Europe, with undesirable jobs increasingly rejected, so welcoming low-cost labor was convenient for capitalism. Moreover, since a certain unofficial political-financial colonization was maintained, welcoming migrants to Europe helped African governments reduce social pressure. London, with the Pound, and Paris, with the CFA Franc dominating in the former colonies, had every interest in this happening.
Over half a century later, all this has taken on entirely different aspects.
Immigration now consists of both third-generation immigrants and newcomers. And it’s not over: third-generation immigrants are either integrated or irreconcilable antagonists.
We must decide what it means to be integrated, because figures like London’s Mayor Sadiq Khan and former Prime Minister Sunak in the UK, or Obama and Kamala Harris in the US, can be considered integrated.
Integrated into which specific culture, however, is the unsolvable question, as the official debate on French identity once initiated by Sarkozy failed to provide an answer; and with good reason!
Geminello Alvi was right: a rootless multiculturalism has developed.
In the banlieues, which are pockets of social and criminal unrest protected and coddled, antagonism becomes a form of class and racial opposition, often finding its flag in a self-made jihadism.
New immigrants must adapt to what’s already there; if they find Sharia granted by authorities in a community-driven perspective, they are obliged to adopt a sordid mix of antagonism and victimhood towards whites.
There is a serious demographic problem.
Wealthy societies, with the exception of the US, are in decline. Among those spiraling downwards are Italy, Japan, and Russia, although, except for the Japanese, the active count also considers immigrants.
The leading management consulting firm, McKinsey, identified a shortage of over 6 million workers in Europe last February, alongside proposing incentives for better utilization of immigrants.
The director of the Bank of Italy, Panetta, maintains that in Italy, even with 170,000 new migrants admitted annually, the current demographic index predicts a shortfall of five and a half million working-age inhabitants in sixteen years, and forecasts a 13% GDP collapse.
It’s worth noting that in the EU, the annual balance of non-European entries and exits is 1.3 million per year. These are the demands of industry, agriculture, the military, and various ancillary sectors.
Even Japan is opening up to migrants, and China, realizing it miscounted its population by over one hundred million, is trying to correct the error quickly.
So, is there no solution?
There certainly can be: with intelligence.
By maximizing the development of robotics and AI, without whining too much about them taking jobs since we’re already taking them away ourselves; if anything, they will reduce the need for replacement.
By changing our mindset and perspective, we must encourage demography and implement a Euro-African geopolitics that can shift the flow, transforming us from passive speculators into active new investors, also drawn by the mineral resources for the economy and technology of the future.
However, this choice must be made immediately to bear fruit in two generations.
Meanwhile, there’s a dramatic present to manage.
The problem is AIDS, a mental, spiritual, and cultural AIDS, understood as an immune deficiency syndrome gripping the society shaped after ’68 by the Frankfurt School model.
It makes little sense to seek a single culprit for the rampant immigration. It’s an entire system involving speculators profiting off the backs of migrants (both the organizations that make money off them and the bipartisan politicians who exploit them for electoral gains), and geopolitical interests. The Kremlin, which repeatedly stated its intention to punish us for colonialism and teach us to live in an ethno-cultural melting pot, is active in this endeavor. It has decriminalized human trafficking in Niger with the announced and achieved goal of increasing the Sub-Saharan push, and in Libya, it does everything to prevent agreements that could curb the phenomenon. Then there’s Soros’s Open Society, followed by various churches. Ankara pursues a neo-Ottoman colonialism that looms in the background of other Wahhabi maneuvers.
There isn’t a single responsible party: it’s a system, both ideological and mental, that we can define as the UN and globalist utopia.
Are the ruling classes passive?
More than that, they are inadequate and move uncertainly. In the last five years, the entire narrative on immigration in Europe has shifted, not by 180 degrees, but still by more than 90.
The focus has shifted from welcoming resources to the proclaimed need to filter, manage, and regulate them. The EU’s support for Italy’s choices of regulation in Tunisia and deportation to Albania would have been unimaginable just a few months ago.
The ruling classes oscillate, caught between not two but three fires: the need to make up for labor shortages and thus the demands of capital; the intermittent civil war (which is no longer just simmering) with growing public dissatisfaction; and the control of communication means by the priests of AIDS, combined with the Leninist occupation of social media by agitprop commissars of immune deficiency.
How can rulers keep the helm in this storm?
There’s no doubt that there won’t be any quick or decisive solution to such a complex, interconnected, and deep-rooted phenomenon.
In some European metropolises today, we’re witnessing the kind of socio-racial clashes that inflamed the US just as immigration was beginning to make its timid way here. We know the American outcome: no one can erase the other.
The problem must be solved with intelligence and strategy, with foresight, but above all, with a focus where duty, bonds, and identity are firmly present.
The British government’s decision to target the weakest, namely the white working class, with heavy penalties while easing the pressure on the other side, even releasing child rapists, isn’t just criminal and cowardly: it’s idiotic.
There was even a Labour MP who dared to suggest that anyone who criticizes migrants should be beheaded. This is insanity. And, unfortunately, it’s not an isolated case.
We can overcome this if we choose to.
We can overcome it with intelligence and planning, but above all with firmness.
Always remembering that “the first enemy is yourself,” and if by that “yourself” we mean our peoples, our enemy is the woke, those who think everything is fine, even if little girls are being slaughtered, as long as they strike at the “patriarchy,” “fascism,” and any form alien to Chaos: haters of the father who accuse others of hating.
They are a pathogenic agent, and antibodies are needed. Because as long as they retain their infectious capacity, no solution can be brought to anything.
But first of all, we must see if we are capable of producing the necessary antibodies.
Because anyone who starts from a hysterical premise that everything here must be destroyed, otherwise nothing can be done; anyone who wags their tail behind Hamas or the Kremlin and is obsessed with the EU is nothing but the inverse shadow of the woke haters and is not moving toward anything positive.
“The first enemy is yourself”: let’s see how much of us is therefore the enemy and start healing it.
The rest is just hooliganism or voyeuristic behavior.
