Will the Populist Tide Change Our Future?
Politics, as such, no longer exists.
It has been transformed into a decision-making process by minorities, shadowed by a mass spectacle designed to involve the public in matters that have no real traction.
This doesn’t mean there are no political issues, but that there is no political culture—except in a few minds.
The issues are numerous. First and foremost in society: relativism—with all its individualistic distortions, from gender madness to the legal and cultural violence of antifa, feminist, lgbtxyzk@, pro-immigration minorities, culturally and biologically genocidal—is one thing.
A framework based on common sense, centuries of experience, and solidarity is another.
And on this front, there appears to be a clash between the new “populist and/or sovereignist” right and the “globalist” left, which seeks to defend the status quo.
But this clash is only APPARENT, because it is based on extreme and foolish slogans, without either side bothering to propose a systemic restructuring (on the globalist side) or a real alternative (on the sovereignist/populist side).
They simply fuel two opposing fires—offering nothing.
The so-called rising populist tide, those whom sociology calls “the losers of globalization,” offers no solutions. Worse still, there isn’t even a shred of a concrete program or any analysis worthy of the name on any of the issues they parade around.
The opposition of the moment merely advocates for the collapse of the other side and pretends that, in their place, the tribunes of discontent would do better.
Yet real-life results—at whatever stage they’ve reached—prove they adapt to everything (also because they have a simplistic view of everything and, when confronted with reality, don’t know where to start).
But there’s something far worse.
Most populist opposition forces are made up of people with no political culture whatsoever and often carry within themselves exactly what they were supposedly formed to oppose.
Just look at the garbage bin that is AfD, which combines LGBT extremism, pro-Israeli fanaticism, Bolshevik nostalgia, miserable welfare dependency, and capitalist selfishness, all seasoned with a Protestant contempt for Mediterranean peoples.
Elsewhere it’s not much better—from the Lega to the Rassemblement National—with historical and cultural references that are, to say the least, bizarre.
Take for instance the glorification of Martin Luther King by a French party that claims to defend the family and the nation, despite having largely voted to enshrine abortion in the Constitution.
Regardless of one’s opinion on the matter, it is so absurd that not even the Moral Order Party from La cage aux folles could have imagined it.
It’s not about prohibiting or legalizing abortion—it’s about putting a reduction in births into the Constitution during a demographic collapse!
On the only issue where there’s a visible battle, the opposition proves rarely better—and often more mediocre—than the institutional forces.
Hardly anyone truly deals with politics; because the decisive battles are taking place within the system itself—both in the international system of states and within domestic structures.
Revolutions that are not even being looked at.
So we remain trapped in a circus sideshow, in a clownish wrestling match.
In this circus duel, we have a populist right that utters a few truths (poorly and without any concrete perspective) that denounce the ruling oligarchy, but then promptly acts against its own nation and is manipulated like a wagging puppet by powerful elites.
Then there’s the left (or center-left, or center-right-left), defined as pro-European or democratic, which—on the international stage—remains relevant and often adopts foreign policy positions that are more sovereign than those of the “sovereignists.”
But in domestic, judicial, cultural, and social policy, it is almost always aberrant.
This happens because there is no political culture, and thus no capacity for synthesis—something that must be based on the Et Et (“both–and”), like during the times of National Revolutions.
Until this regenerative and revolutionary synthesis is achieved, I believe you may as well vote for sovereignist/populist opposition forces, if only to avoid feeling alone.
At the very least, it will contribute to a collective psychological balance.
But if you expect something positive from those forces—and especially if you buy into the string of absurdities, arrogance, and human pettiness they display—you will not only waste your time, but your energy as well.
Worse still: you’ll end up turning that energy unconsciously against yourselves and against the possible future of your people and your land.
Use that energy instead to act upon yourselves!
