I have been repeating for months, perhaps a year, that the only thing that could save Russia from collapse would be a decisive move by the Americans. Given that they could not bomb Ukraine—since they have to keep a foot in both camps because they absolutely need Europe’s economic and logistical resources—they had to find a workaround to save their own Rapid Response Unit – the Moscow servant – which attacked us from the east and from the south (Sahel and Libya).
Obviously, the attack on Iran with the entirely predictable blocking of Hormuz does not have only this purpose, but it has this purpose nonetheless.
Russia is drained
It lost the war long ago, but it is essential that some external intervention allows it to pass off its failure at least as a draw. Having no strength to break through on the ground, being bled dry in logistics, and having failed in the markets, this pathetic yet boastful petro-state could not have reached next summer without seriously sitting down at the negotiating table and renouncing a good part of the claims over Ukraine made by its mafia clique.
The rise in oil prices and the – A m e r i c a n – unlocking of purchases of Russian oil allow Moscow, at the very least, to postpone bankruptcy, if not avoid it.
The ever-present master has once again intervened to help his bloody Russian puppet.
Wiping the blackboard clean
To get rid of the simplistic binary schemes of the simple-minded, let us remember that the United States has never broken with Russia, which moreover contributes 12% of American nuclear power, and that Israel has not only refused military support to Kyiv but has repeatedly reaffirmed the preferential relationship linking Moscow and Tel Aviv. (Or perhaps it would be more correct to say Jerusalem, given that in Russia, as among Jewish settlers, jihadists and imams, the worldview is obscurantist, fanatical and repressive.)
Obviously the attack on Iran
was not decided for this reason alone, but also for this reason.
It includes a series of dynamics ranging from the disputes between ayatollahs and Wahhabis for control of oil flows, to fluctuations in the price per barrel—which always enrich the same people, absolutely “cross-cutting”—and then the prospects of Greater Israel, as well as the race for leadership within the Abraham alliances.
But it would be wrong to fragment the picture
Between Africa, the East and the Middle East there is a pincer movement underway aimed at ensuring that changes in the political, economic and energy scenario do not allow European autonomy. This is a process that has been underway for a long time, increasingly relentless, which Americans and Russians fear and about which they make no secret.
One would not be too wrong in saying that this is yet another version of the eternal 1945.
A war above all against us.
When I say “us,” I mean Europeans
but also the peoples who would be our partners: the Arab peoples in their pan-Arab and social-national variants, and also the Iranian people, victims at the same time of those who bomb them and those who oppress them through terror. Because, however many far-fetched parallels are made, in Iraq there has not been a series of popular uprisings crushed in blood and followed by hangings—and even less so in Ukraine—whereas in Iran there have been, and that must mean something. Apart from the infamous role played from 23 September 1980 onward by Tehran in destroying every cause that disturbed the United States and Israel.
Considering the triple and quadruple games
that are customary in Tehran—and which have emerged not only from the Iran-Contra affair and Ahmadinejad’s statements, but also from recent palace conspiracies—I do not at all exclude that part of the Iranian oligarchy is complicit with those who attacked their country, that it is carrying out an internal coup—not a regime change but a change of patrons—and that it is even profiting from it.
Gangsters understand each other perfectly.
War against Europe and the peoples, then?
Yes.
And there is the internal front
Here we find Marranos and traitors who are bending over backwards in every possible way and in every sector—from the Paralympics to the Venice Film Festival—to roll out the red carpet to welcome the Russians, thus pleasing the Americans (1). After all, almost all these “pro-Russians” come from Gladio and NATO environments.
In the refusal to see the whole picture as it is, and in the repetition—each in their own way—of a distorted Tolkien-like scheme, pro-Russians, pro-Israelis, pro-Iranians, pro-Hamas supporters, pro-Americans and defenders of the “most beautiful Constitution in the world” are united by the same servile spirit, and it is precisely on this that the perennial rulers rely most.
They do not fight us from the outside but from within.
On the Italian and European internal front there are three important and imminent events.
The first is support for Ukraine, which the various agents (who are often more manipulated than agents) of the Russo-Americans will want to sabotage in order to save the face—and perhaps the life—of their puppet in Moscow.
The second is the Justice Referendum of March 22–23, because the mafias, anti-national powers, the Russians and the Americans (not the EU) must succeed in keeping Italy under control, as it is taking on an important role in non-servile international changes.
The third is the elections in Hungary, where all the patrons must try to keep the crypto-Bolshevik on a special mission, Orbán, in the saddle, as he seriously risks paying at the ballot box for his betrayal of Hungarian blood in the electoral challenge coming from a nationalist candidate.
It is a war on all fronts
and the worst way to face it is to get lost cheering for one or another of our enemies who, however much they may rival one another, are all operating against us.
Whoever serves one of them—whoever it may be—is in fact acting as a partisan helper.
Even worse are those who defend one of those bloody clowns—like the Russians or the Iranians—passing them off to themselves and to others as if they were opponents of a global and criminal power of which they are instead precisely the life insurance.
Is the price of oil rising?
Of course—and it is not the first time.
But if the argument being made now is that we should therefore buy from the Russians, then there are two possibilities: either one has understood nothing of what is happening, or one is exactly like those who prostituted themselves to the Americans for a bar of chocolate.
(1) The author refers to the decisions of the organizing committees, both private, to officially invite the Russian delegations under their own flag despite their country’s open hostility toward the Italian nation and despite the decisions taken by the Italian State and by the Meloni government.
