On Thursday night there will be a France–Morocco match and for several hours in Paris, as in other French cities, destruction, devastation, assaults, and even possible lynchings of white people are expected.
A recurring scenario in similar circumstances that exposes the king of the progressive fairy tale.
World championships are the very essence of the opium of the people
We are told the story of a multiethnic paradise in which everyone can choose to be German, French, British, Martian, and represent peoples to whom they are rarely connected and whom they often despise. It is somewhat the doctrine of gender applied to nationality: each individual atom can consider itself whatever it wants, at will and intermittently.
There is also a positive realist aspect in this mainstream tale, which is that it reminds everyone that the wealthiest societies—and therefore especially white ones—are no longer having children, and therefore the migratory phenomenon, especially with second or third generations produced, has made the situation not necessarily “irreversible” but one that must be handled with structured logic, a multi-generational perspective, and above all common sense. A common sense that first of all requires removing the priests of open societies and Hollywood artificial paradises from the management of mass culture, public order, and the organizations of a supposedly benevolent form of slavery.
This brazen racism
This is not the place to discuss different approaches to the problem of low birth rates and migration; here I simply point out the madness of the dominant culture and its deep racism, because it is racist in every respect. It is so in the philosophy of jus soli, which effectively considers the nationality of any European country superior to that of the immigrant’s country of origin. It is so in a maternalistic logic, in which the immigrant is pampered like a puppy, as an inferior to be re-educated by modern matriarchs who believe they are his guardians.
It is also so in language. For example, the word “negro” is rejected. This is only because its American distortion, “nigger,” is derogatory. Yet it is unfortunate that “negro” in Spanish simply means black, and that there is even a current of African thought and culture that defines itself in French as “négritude.” By rejecting “negro,” we have arrived at “person of color” (which is itself absurd, since chromatically it is white people who should be called colored, because white is the sum of all colors), and eventually decided they are simply “African.”
Another absurdity
Years ago, in Paris, the cashier of a supermarket who followed me online recognized me and asked me to get him one of my books. I came back to bring it to him, but he was not on duty, so I asked when I could find him. When I returned, he said: “You shocked my manager.” “Why?” “Because you called me Arab.” “And what should I have said?” “Maghrebi.” “But ‘Maghrebi’ is only a geographical term; ‘Arab’ also refers to language and culture! How do you define yourself?” “I am Arab; but they are crazy!”
Morocco has as many as seven players born in France who feel Moroccan. An identitarian mindset; France, on the other hand, has a “banlieusard” type mentality, which I will explain shortly.
African and Asian teams are all identitarian
White teams are not, with few exceptions, precisely because of low birth rates, to which is added the existential shift of video games from an early age; therefore not only are white populations decreasing, but they are also playing less football. That is why there are national teams composed of up to 90% neo-French players (if that is the correct term?), instead of at most 25%, which would reflect their proportion in the society they have become a distorted mirror of.
Progressive, integrationist and globalist whites continue to pamper their footballers in order to win by proxy through them. But they do not consider them equal. Otherwise, why would they call them Afro-Americans when they play for New World national teams? They have been there for over four centuries—why would they still be “African” unless the preachers of “Keep racism out” are biological and sociological racists who cannot avoid emphasizing the very difference they claim to fight?
A clear example of the use of the new askaris is the German national team. If it truly reflected society, it would be full of Turks rather than Black players, as it currently is by choice, for failed purposes of victory. There is no trace left of the team that, whoever played, would transform once it wore the white jersey and thus won four World Cups and three European Championships. Today it appears distracted and listless, as if its traditional qualities had been inherited by Cape Verde.
The French case is unique
The banlieue archipelago, where there is widespread social distress supported by every kind of maternalistic immunity for all sorts of crimes, from rape to drug trafficking, has produced a human type in which social revenge, racial pride, and refuge in certain distortions of Islam have created an explosive mixture that ignites whenever possible. An archipelago of banlieues that practices anti-white racism within itself, because white people are only exceptionally admitted to local teams and are discriminated against from the outset, when they are lucky enough to be considered.§
This also explains why there are relatively few white players available for the French national team.
The France-banlieue model is a social and cultural disaster, not just a public order issue. It is the culmination of an artificial imaginary created by a spoiled bourgeoisie, living in residential neighborhoods and, without too much involvement, considering itself the builder of a Netflix-style Eden which, however, turns out to be rather infernal.
It is not only the effect of difficult coexistence between different
ethnicities and cultures blended into a global marketing mush, but also of a perverse form of governance, since in other places where multi-ethnicity has long existed after the near disappearance of indigenous peoples, it has developed without ideological pied pipers. There is no comparison between the impact of the French national team and that of Brazil on the daily life of their respective nations, whether ideologically or in terms of social cohesion and public order.
In France, an Enlightenment legacy, combined with the “existential AIDS” coming from intellectual centers such as the Frankfurt School and combined with Trotskyist logic, has ended up producing a monster that today even tries to give itself an ideological guise through the so-called “Islamo-leftism” of Mélenchon.
The Moroccan national team, by contrast, is an example of identity, also because of the choice of seven players who could have worn the French jersey.
The match between the Blues and a Maghrebi nation will likely be instrumentalized by social anger, looting, and banlieue violence, which will appropriate a confrontation that is hardly shared in Morocco. The problem persists between France and Algeria, not there.
But banlieue residents of all backgrounds will turn Thursday’s clash into a derby that is not actually a derby in Rabat
.
We do not know what damage will occur
from Thursday night onward, nor whether there will be victims, as often happens, and which will not make much noise in the media so as not to challenge the mainstream fairy tale maintained by the sorcerer’s apprentices who have governed us for decades.
In any case, on Thursday a so-called identitarian national team, Morocco, will face that of the globetrotters, and the announced tragedies—which we hope will not occur—will be downplayed by those who must at all costs sanctify their own sociobiological racism, which they hastily label “antiracism” because these people are always afraid of being honest with themselves. What they hate most is the truth.
And if they were honest with themselves, they would be different people.
And our societies would be much better off.
